I know why I like this. I can pipe up when I think I have something to say, and I can say what I wan without repercussion.
Once more, same as before [original context HERE]:
Power of censorship???/?
who has the power to censor a book or newspaper? nobody right? but where in the constitution does it say that?
31 minutes ago
3 days left to answer.
The first amendment of the constitution is very clear on the things that GOVERNMENT cannot do. All of the bill of rights is the same way. They are limitations on the power of the government, not the people. They are ten precious reassurances to the people that any federal body shall never abridge these things.
There are a couple of things here to consider. The bill of rights, the first ten amendments to the federal constitution, refers only to what the federal government cannot do. The tenth amendment; ‘The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,’ is specific, and precise. Just like the rest of the document;
The first amendment, ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.’, only controls the federal law-making body. Specific and precise again.
The Bill of Rights specifically does not limit the states, or individuals from doing what is outside the purview of the federal government.
So, that being said, you would have to look into the law in your state, but I think it is a roundly accepted matter of course in the writing of state constitutions that people would have the right to be free of this type of tyranny.
The same can NEVER be said of the individual. An individual always has the right to censor a book. They can tear out a page, cross out a passage, or boycott the book entirely. They cannot go into a bookstore and do the same to the books in stock. That would be destruction of private property, and that is already against the law. They cannot go into a library and do the same thing, because the books there are held in public trust, and therefore destroying them is also against the law already.
That is all thing one, i.e. the government is subject to limitations such that they are never able to censor any book or writing or speech. On to thing two:
Effective censorship.
If the same guy mentioned above that crossed out the passage where the dish ran away with the spoon in his own book, didn’t want anyone to read it, he would indeed have a number of options to make sure this never happened.
He could buy the publisher, and take the book out of production. A perfect example of his exercise of free enterprise. Nothing to be done about the books already printed, though. Hmmm.
He could organize a protest that would surround and berate anyone who wanted to buy the book at the store, or check it out of the library. And by rights he should. The whole dish-spoon infidelity has gotten out of hand.
Eventually the public outcry would be so strong that the store would want the book off their shelves to appease the people bothering their customers, and the library is subject to funding pressures that put decision-making power in the hands of people voting in the city council chambers, and, by extension, the community.
Done correctly, and within the laws and standards of the community, this is the perfect expression of his right to peaceable assembly. Anything outside that is already against the law.
Conclusion: The government has no right whatsoever to limit the ability for the electorate to read what they like, and the individual has rights limited only by their imagination.
This is what they had in mind when the language for the constitution was chosen, chewed up, fought over and rewritten. They got it right and defined the longest standing governing document IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.
Please think about how this example is different from what you see and think in the world every day. Read the constitution and above all, think for yourself